Even columns have leads, and I am pleased to report  I found Mark  Brown's today in Sun-Times.  It took some digging, but there it was, at  the very end: " . . .  the citizens of Cook County deserve to be kept  completely informed about [county board president  Stroger's] health in the coming days."  (Nice going, Jim! For  finding it)  There it was, 'way at the bottom, coated in vanilla,  and nicely stated as to "completely informed," not partially.  Brown was  lied to by relatives, and the rest is blah blah blah spelling it out in no  certain terms the people's right to know the health of elected  officials
 Meanwhile, the long arm of Middle East terrorism  reached Urbana yesterday when the  Daily Illini editor was fired for running anti-Muslim cartoons.  Not  3,000 New Yorkers in a tall building the victims this time, just the First  Amendment.  No problem, U. of I. trustees or publisher's board.  We  feel your pain, you stinking cowards.
 And Atty Genl Lisa Madigan, who may or may not  still belong to the  gov's love-hate commission, wants no part of controlling a public-complaint  mechanism she devised.  She's worried about AG's to come who might screw up  how complaints are registered or questions asked about open meetings and using  freedom of info.  She  gets lots of complaints as things stand, and wants to keep it that  way.  Does she mean the boxed  form on her web site that I used two days ago to ask if she's on the  love-hate commission?  Nothing yet from her, by the way, and I have some  Jewish voters waiting to hear.  Maybe even some non-Jews, who  knows?
 Finally, it's quite interesting that in the wake of  recent fatal South Side shootings, there's no outcry (screaming headlines) about  (a) gun control -- though "delusional"  Mayordaley II apparently made some customary noises about it -- and (b) root  causes of gang criminality.  Sun-Times did have "Instant  Messages" emailed from readers that touched on the former but also had the  two items that in this blog's opinion matter most in these matters: 1.  Decriminalization of recreational drug use and 2. draconian law  enforcement.  
 The former would require a change of heart mostly  of white libs, the latter of them and the affected, afflicted community, which  would have to permit cops to get tough.  Since this would mean jailing  neighbors' sons, among other things (deport gang-bangers, said one letter  writer!) , I bet on decriminalization happening before any unleashing of  cops.  Oh, another -- yes, better -- idea was for parents etc. to take back  the sidewalks by standing on the corners watching all the drug customers drive  by.  Is this affected, afflicted community up to such unanimity?  Not  so far.
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment