There are times when you think Dennis Hastert has nothing to say. It’s that way with wrestling coaches, you suppose. But sometimes he does that preconception in:
The United States cannot win the global war on terror if U.S. leaders don't understand it -- and Rep. Nancy Pelosi does not understand it, House Speaker Dennis Hastert said on Tuesday.
Hastert -- who holds the job that Pelosi is eager to assume -- was reacting to Pelosi's remarks on the CBS program "60 Minutes." He said her comments should serve as a "bellwether" [sic] for the American people.
"Democrat Leader Pelosi would trust the terrorists to give up their objective and play nice in exchange for the United States leaving Iraq. This outlook is foolish, naive and dangerous," Hastert said.
To be sure, but in any case it’s not just Iraq, as our ambassador to that beleaguered fledgling democracy said:
"The broader Middle East is the source of most of the world's security problems," said Zalmay Khalilzad, the U.S. ambassador to Iraq. "The struggle for the future of the region is between moderate and extremist political forces. The outcome in Iraq will profoundly shape this wider struggle and in turn, the security of the world."
In this view, which may be old stuff to wiser readers, in a war against a relatively amorphous enemy, surgical strikes are difficult. Slam-bang the nest of bad guys and — what? Effect a five-year moratorium on enemy successes in the homeland? As has been achieved?
Pelosi thinks that enemy will leave Iraq if we do. Why does she think that? And if she’s right, where will they go? To Russia?
No comments:
Post a Comment